粘贴一段最近在读的艺术史理论里黑格尔的胡话供你体会一下：
The second demand, derived from the first, requires of the content of art that it be not anything abstract in itself, but concrete, though not concrete in the sense in which the sensuous is concrete when it is contrasted with everything spiritual and intellectual and these are taken to be simple and abstract. For everything genuine in spirit and nature alike is inherently concrete and, despite its universality, has nevertheless subjectivity and particularity in itself. If we say, for example, of God that he is simply one, the supreme being as such, we have thereby only enunciated a dead abstraction of the sub-rational Understanding. Such a God, not apprehended himself in his concrete truth, will provide no content for art, especially not for visual art. Therefore the Jews and the Turks have not been able by art to represent their God, who does not even amount to such an abstraction of the Understanding, in the positive way that the Christians have. For in Christianity God is set forth in his truth, and therefore as thoroughly concrete in himself, as person, as subject, and, more closely defined, as spirit. What he is as spirit is made explicit for religious apprehension as a Trinity of Persons, which yet at the same time is self-aware as one. Here we have essentiality or universality, and particularization, together with their reconciled unity, and only such unity is the concrete. Now since a content, in order to be true at all, must be of this concrete kind, art too demands similar concreteness, because the purely abstract universal has not in itself the determinate character of advancing to particularization and phenomenal manifestation and to unity with itself in these.
靠谱人生茶话会
（超自然？
虽然有种说法是安全级和欧几里得级才是scp最具想象力的部分
宗教都是大金主，但人家有自己的宗教学院、宗教学者、有不同于科学的宗教体系，不用玩这一套。
于是，科学每天早上起床问自己，今天的我一统天下了吗
早期心理学如果不是科学，那么行为心理学出现后，它仍然不是科学，没道理儿子当了皇帝，爸爸就也成了皇帝。这和经济意义没有关系，现代物理学除了促进拉动内需、促进消费，还有什么经济意义
这是两个不同阶段的东西。与现代科学对话的是现代神学，不是经院哲学，后者说白了已经是死学科了，一个思想史名词。决定现代心理学科学性质的也是行为心理学，不是早期心理学，至于早期心理学是不是科学，与这没有关系。后者也是一个死学科，两者之间只有发生学上的联系。进化论思维就是拿大猩猩与黑猩猩比，而不是拿大猩猩与黑猩猩的祖先比。至于现代宗教学者边不边缘，怀特海还是和罗素谈笑风生，写科布还是发核刊。
另外你下次删文章删目录之前能不能说一下，我刚才看到你想翻翻你之前创建的那个目录结果又没了
目录的事很抱歉，我当时是打算编辑的，点太快不小心给误删了。下次删东西会提前通知你的
但不得不说，相对于新儒家、以及更早之前传统经学下的康有为、章太炎所做的工作，儒学现代化的道路还很漫长。我不怀疑未来可能出现的儒学复兴，但它现在仍是一个思想史名词，至少不是儒家宪政主义口中的那种可以利用的现代性资源。禅宗的“初心”是被写进了新一代亚洲男子天团的口号，但这背后又真的有一整套现代治理观念吗？
又是由于什么样的原因 现在的这么些回复没有杀掉你这个幻想呢 ~
要是遇到了没有实体的怪异该怎么办
沟通不能的话会收到精神攻击的样子
只能电疗了吧
我怎么觉得你只是单纯想找个超自然生物和与它配套的很酷炫的伪科学理论解释它..
那我建议你停止你的奇怪的想法并去了解了解SCP和克苏鲁..或者多去学点科学
科学永远都不可能达到“宇宙的真理”，至于“接近”，不给接近的定义我也不知道你的“接近”是个什么意思，所以没法赞同也没法反对。在我看来科学的发展使它在概率意义下更加可靠，实用价值越来越高，仅此而已，我也无意否定科学的发展。但如果真的存在“绝对真理”的话，那科学永远都不会沾上它的边，从牛顿到老爱再到现在的量子力学，我不觉得物理学比伽利略时代更符合真理了。
p.s:我用的“科学”都只代指自然科学，其他的学问我是反对把它们归纳进科学的范畴的。
至于数学，“数学是人造的，逻辑是先验的”这是心理主义那一套吧，研究数学本身的大部分不关注，而心理主义貌似不被大多数哲学家所容吧，我也是科学主义和心理主义的坚定反对者。
扯这些有的没的是想说，如果你是纯粹经验论的立场，那我们在前提上就达不成共识，也不可能说服彼此。
我不觉得数学是经验的，所以认为它有可能达到真理，当然真理是怎样的甚至存不存在我都不知道。但不管怎么说以演绎为核心的数学和以实验归纳为基础的科学有着本质的差异。
想问的其实是为什么会产生鬼怪神魔这样的东西啊。
The second demand, derived from the first, requires of the content of art that it be not anything abstract in itself, but concrete, though not concrete in the sense in which the sensuous is concrete when it is contrasted with everything spiritual and intellectual and these are taken to be simple and abstract. For everything genuine in spirit and nature alike is inherently concrete and, despite its universality, has nevertheless subjectivity and particularity in itself. If we say, for example, of God that he is simply one, the supreme being as such, we have thereby only enunciated a dead abstraction of the sub-rational Understanding. Such a God, not apprehended himself in his concrete truth, will provide no content for art, especially not for visual art. Therefore the Jews and the Turks have not been able by art to represent their God, who does not even amount to such an abstraction of the Understanding, in the positive way that the Christians have. For in Christianity God is set forth in his truth, and therefore as thoroughly concrete in himself, as person, as subject, and, more closely defined, as spirit. What he is as spirit is made explicit for religious apprehension as a Trinity of Persons, which yet at the same time is self-aware as one. Here we have essentiality or universality, and particularization, together with their reconciled unity, and only such unity is the concrete. Now since a content, in order to be true at all, must be of this concrete kind, art too demands similar concreteness, because the purely abstract universal has not in itself the determinate character of advancing to particularization and phenomenal manifestation and to unity with itself in these.